This is the business
angle of a reply, so I've separated it into another post...
Michelle I had noticed too, but if I even got started with Max in a loincloth I wouldn't be able to go out from my fantasy and lust and it wouldn't be good since my finals are getting closer and closer. Damn RL!!!
—I never doubted you for a minute! You!
When we've been neck-and-neck on fb for so many stories? You render my existence almost superfluous, in that you always think my great (cough) thoughts before me, or after, just one step. I knew
you were probably taking time out just to fan yourself, or to regain consciousness. (It was a stunner, stumbling across the image of Max in a loincloth!)
Ahhhh, you figured me out. Max and "Liz" in skimpy clothes, no zippers or buttons to get in the way, yards and yards of skin exposed, with more just waiting for that right moment to be liberated.
Alas, will they or won't they? Or will fate interfere?
, O Revered Mistress of Pain? (see how I combined them there? Your two titles?) Of course
we know you are merciful and beneficent only as a prelude to more pain!
And I won't even speculate as to what page in the dictionary would have an epithet appropriate to describing us
... Wouldn't be pretty.
How about they will and then fate can interfere and then loincloth Max can say "Thanks, but no thanks?"
'K, here's the business part: Have you taken out a patent, yet, on "Loincloth Max"? I think it would way out-perform, er I mean, out-sell
(of course you sensed that, who know me so well) the paltry likes of Malibu Ken!
And then there's the "fur-covered breasts" merchandizing tie-ins with Victoria's Secret... Or maybe, given the fur, it should be "Katherine the Great's Secret"?
I think you could make a fortune,
Most of all, the movie rights... With the part of Loincloth Max already cast, or "attached" as they say in the movie biz... "locked" even.
I'm stopping now. Going quietly.